This is the power of the blogs.
For some months now, I have been writing back to the editors of the newspapers that put out incorrect stories on the OZ issue. Some of these emailed letters have been acknowledged while some of the editors have simply either moved the emails to deleted or junk items. They have anyway served a useful purpose.
EDUCATION TIMES of TIMES OF INDIA
IN AN ARTICLE ‘Residency Down Under’, dated Monday, August 24, 2009, the journalist Rosanne Barrett, detailed on how the Indian students were being duped in Australia. She confused Private Colleges as Private Universities and put it out as a subheading. I being an alumnus of Bond University, Australia’s first Private University knew the value and quality of a Private University first hand AND how the journalist had tripped on the details. I wrote to the Editor of the newspaper’s edition in Kolkata on 29th August 2009. He forwarded my complaint to Ms Nipa Vaidya, Editor of Education Times in Mumbai as the article originated from their Mumbai bureau.
.
She also ends her reply by stating…
I can understand your concern since you are such an integral part of the Indo-Australian educational fraternity. In our continuous effort to better ourselves and present facts to our readers, we would issue a corrigendum that clarifies the private colleges/ universities confusion. Needless to say, this is definitely not the last article we will be publishing about Australia. As and when we come across stories that would benefit our readers, they will be published in all editions of Education Times with relevant research and accurate information.
BBC WORLD SERVICE
BBC’s report on the issue was also lacking in substance and carried many inaccuracies. I had done an earlier blog identifying the issues (find link to blog EVEN BBC GETS IT WRONG). I forwarded the link to the BBC and they immediately acknowledged and now after a few weeks have replied:
I am sure that this feedback has been taken constructively and this is what makes BBC an admired news source.
OUTLOOK
OUTLOOK magazine carried a cover story titled WHY AUSSIES HATE US and this really ruffled many because of the inadequate research done by the journalist and the fact that it highlighted small voices within Australia such as PM Kevin Rudd’s nephew and totally ignored the main players. It also seemed to be totally contradictory in parts. I was angry too especially because the news magazine, like BBC, is known for its good stories and because I considered it as a balanced publication. Maybe the fact that the editor of the magazine is popular with some of my friends due to his role as the editor of India’s first MEN’s magazine at the time when we were all growing up, has something to do with it. My anger got vented through my scathing blog (see link to DISSECTING INCORRECT OUTLOOK) and I did forward a copy to the email ID of the newsmagazine. It did not get acknowledged but that’s inconsequential now that after a week, OUTLOOK devoted a record number of pages to the LETTERS TO THE EDITOR on that particular cover story. Not just that, the letters continued and found place in the latter issues too. I want to quote from one such letter in the current edition that clearly summarises the general opinion. A reader from Mumbai (Subhashish Chattopadhyay) wrote:
TIMES NOW
While I congratulate Outlook for allowing feedback and criticism to flow back, I remain astounded by TIMES NOW which not just edits/deletes my feedbacks on their show from web-responses, My emails to its Editor, “The Great Mr Arnab Goswami” and my SMS to his mobile never got acknowledged.
The channel, though in recent days, has become milder and has attempted at getting some panelists on NEWSHOUR debates such as Mr Sanjiv Srivastava (who stumped Suhel Seth by asking for the dictionary meaning of RACISM), Mr Naveen Chopra and Ms Padma Rao in addition to former Indian High Commissioner to Australia, Mr Parthasarthy, to balance out the untrained Suhel Seth and “gone old” Natwar Singh, it still gives factually weak explanations for the inaccurate and biased coverage.
When it was apparent that Jasbir had burnt himself for insurance(see link), the channel focused more on Australians trying to change the story by stating that Jasbir had self-inflicted the injury. (Mr Goswami just forgot that this was not the first time that Indians had done this in Australia. See link to another such story.)
When the investigations into the Ranjodh murder revealed that the killers were Indians, Times Now, unable to digest this twist in the story labeled the killers as “AUS” couple instead. THIS WAS HEIGHT OF BIAS that run with the channel. When the Editorial Director of TIMES NOW was asked on why this aspect of the story was not covered, the reply was (see link);
Times Now editorial director Hector Kenneth told The Weekend Australian there had been coverage of Singh’s murder, but the footage had been “purged” as part of regular updating.
What kind of blatant lie is this!!! See this link from TIMES NOW which clearly shows that the news-item is not purged and it displays the bias with the killers being headlined as AUS COUPLE.
Other MEDIA VEHICLES:
There are instances when I have pointed out formally or informally to various journalists on any inaccuracies in their reports and there are some who have also corrected their reports. I enjoy a good relationship with many because they understand that my intention is not to stop them from discharging their job but simply to assist in performing an “inaccuracy check” on the articles. Some have run past their draft of the stories and I thank them for this honour.
NDTV and CNNIBN stand out as examples of TV journalism where an attempt has been made in the direction of balancing opinions. Barkha Dutt, Sagarika Ghose and Karan Thapar have all done wonderful debates/interviews that have not had the stink of bias on them. INDIAN EXPRESS, HINDU and TELEGRAPH stand out amongst the newspapers for the reports that have appeared.
Now, we enter a phase when the Indian Media has matured overall and leaving aside sensationalists, there are many worth engaging with.
Let me end this blog in “hope” even with the TOI group.
Times of India today reports Australian Foreign Minister’s visit. The reporting is factual and positive. (See link). However, I remain surprised that though this gets prominence in TOI editions around the country and even though the visit was to a college in Delhi barely a few kilometers away from the TOI office, the reporting is by PRESS TRUST OF INDIA, India’s trusted wire service. (Was it my friend “ONE LAST QUESTION” doing the report, I wonder.) TOI didnot send its own correspondent????
At the same time, Economic Times (also of the TOI group) puts out a report on the same event and by their political bureau. The article (see link) adds the Indian government’s perspective and ends the report with this:
India has largely expressed satisfaction with the steps taken by Australia. Mr Krishna told the Rajya Sabha in a written reply said that over 100 Indians were attacked in Australia since May 2009. He added that some of the incidents could have racial overtones.
“While we continue to receive reports of sporadic attacks on Indians in Australia, there does not appear to be any evidence to indicate a persistent rise,” Mr Krishna said. The minister also said that the government had not dissuaded Indian students from going to Australia, but advised certain basic precautions.
So, do keep penning your COMMENTS to the blogs as they too reach the EDITORS along with my LETTERS.
Leave a comment